_ The fifth installment of my continuing series with GeorgeAnn Hughes will be posted this Wednesday evening as usual. We will be talking about the mechanics of miracles and other aspects of supergeometric theory.

We have a last minute booking with the two-hour live broadcast of the Kevin Smith Show for this Wednesday, 12/21 at 10:00pm Eastern. This is an incredible opportunity to present my new theories on a show that’s been widely acclaimed for over ten years. Kevin Smith is heard and watched weekly (yes, there’s a live TV link for members, while the audio is free to everyone) by approximately 1.7 million listeners worldwide through web networks, live feeds, numerous AM and FM station broadcasts, and even international shortwave. Go to http://www.kevinsmithshow.com/ to listen live (you’ll see the links near the top of the page right below the header). The show will be accessible for free at this link until the following Wednesday, after which you will need a membership to access the archived show. The format for this show is the first- hour interview, followed by open lines for call-in questions to the guest during the second hour, so this should be an interesting and lively show.

The Thresholds Radio show link has now been posted at http://ufo-info.com/show/12182011/.

_ My interview on Mysterious Universe is now posted. This was one of those shows where everything came together in such a way so that I was able to touch on all the right keynotes within the time allotted—well worth the listen. Find it at: http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2011/12/mysterious-universe-episode-623/

_ The headline of an online Washington Post article published today reads, “’God Particle’: Scientists close in on evidence of Higgs boson existence.” This appeared in contrast to the trickle of information being previously released, namely, that scientists were running out of places to look for this hypothetical particle, and were losing hope for its discovery. Did they now finally detect something? So as I’m reading it, I come upon the following statements:
 
“Scientists at the European Organization for Nuclear Research have narrowed the range where the hypothetical “God particle” created at the beginning of the universe may be found, closing in on evidence of its existence.”
TRANSLATION: We’ve already looked at the most likely places and found nothing, and so are running out of places where it might be.

“While the scientists found “tantalizing hints” of the particle, it’s too early to say whether it exists, the scientists said.”
TRANSLATION: We have nothing.

 “We cannot conclude anything at this stage.”
TRANSLATION: Ditto.
 
“Finding the Higgs boson could be a gateway to discovering new physics.”
TRANSLATION: We know that we previously reported repeatedly that NOT discovering the Higgs would lead us to a ‘new physics’, but the phrase is so cool-sounding and stirs so much attention that we’re parroting it at every opportunity. 

“The significance of the hints reported today could turn into proof beyond a doubt come next October.”
QUESTION: What hints???? They reported nothing.
TRANSLATION: We previously reported that we’d know by 2012. Now we’re giving ourselves another year.

“CERN said in September that an experiment showed a neutrino beam appears to have moved faster than the speed of light. The finding, if confirmed, would contradict Albert Einstein, who said nothing can exceed light speed.”
TRANSLATION: Since neither we scientists nor the writer really has anything to report, and since it only sounds sensational by the way we took nothing and painted “something” over it, we need to add this previously reported sensation that, even though it has been universally rejected by virtually every credible scientific authority as faulty science, our lipstick-on-a-pig journalistic approach just wasn’t cutting it on its own, even by our own nebulous and diluted standards.

Modern journalism + modern science  =  > 0  [I think I have the math right—I checked my work too]

_ We have a latecomer to this week’s lineup. Through the Keyhole with Karyn Dolan will be broadcast live on Friday evening, 12/16/11 starting at 7:00pm Eastern. This is a two-hour show, although I do not know whether I will grace the entire time slot. The live broadcast can be accessed at http://ufoparanormalradio.homestead.com/Main_Page_version_2.html, or you can find links at http://keyholepublishing.com/KarynDolan.htm. However, I cannot find any location for the archived shows, at least, none that are recent. I’m still waiting for a response back about these archives, and I’ll post it when I receive a reply.

_ Previously, I posted interviews as they were booked. Starting this week, I’m going to change that around and announce at the beginning of each week those interviews that are scheduled for that week. We have five so far for this week:
 
Monday 12/12/11, 7:30pm Eastern
MYSTERIOUS UNIVERSE
This is not a live broadcast. The pre-recorded podcast appears to be posted sometime on the Friday following the interview. Go to www.mysteriousuniverse.org/category/podcasts/

Wednesday 12/14/11
THE BYTE SHOW with GeorgeAnn Hughes
This is the fourth installment in a continuing series of interviews about Behind the Cosmic Veil. I now have my own page on her site, which I deem quite an honor, since she’s interviewed many, many people over the years. The pre-recorded interview will be posted sometime on the Wednesday evening. Go to http://www.thebyteshow.com/ThomasPFusco.html

Wednesday 12/14/11 8:00pm Eastern
FIRED UP RADIO with Steven Raebel
This is a two-hour live broadcast on Blog Talk Radio with a call-in number. Go to http://www.blogtalkradio.com/steven-raebel/2011/12/15/a-new-theory-of-the-paranormal-w-author-tom-fusco for the live show, or you can find the recorded program listed at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/steven-raebel.
 
Thursday 12/15/11 (pre-recorded, posted onsite Sunday 11/17)
THRESHOLDS RADIO
This is a pre-recorded podcast that is posted on Sunday evening after the interview. Go to  www.ufo-info.com/ufo/index.php and click on the PODCAST link on the navigation bar, or the Click Here to Listen to Our Show bar directly below.

Friday 12/16/11
THE KATE VALENTINE SHOW
This is a pre-recorded podcast that will be posted shortly after the interview that day. Go to http://www.atlanticcoastufos.com/past_shows.html and look for my name in the right hand column of past shows.

_I have an interview with Jim Harold’s Paranormal Podcast on this Thursday, December 8 at 9PM Eastern. Jim is a recognized radio personality in the paranormal community. Details are a little sketchy due to some problems we’ve had with emails, so I’m not sure if this is live or just a podcast. It appears as if the interview is about a half-hour, so I’ll have to talk quick (they usually go over with me anyway because I’m such a fascinating guy!). From what I can tell, you can listen live by going to http://jimharold.com/listen-or-watch-now/ and click on the PARANORMAL PODCAST (audio player) link. This will also be the place to listen to the podcast after the show once it’s posted.

Sincerest apologizes if you have tried to contact me using the contact form on the "Contact Us" page.  It was brought to my attention that the form was non-functioning.  We now have it working and have also added a direct email link in case it fails again.  Again, heartfelt apologizes to anyone who has tried to contact me and couldn't.  Hopefully, this problem will not occur again.

_ I will be the guest on The Edge Television Broadcast with Daniel Ott on Saturday, December 10 at 8:15PM Eastern. While the host may be televised, I (fortunately) will not, but you’ll hear me. For the live broadcast, go to  www.theedgeam.com and you’ll see the player in the center column. You have a choice of Watch Live or Listen Live buttons. If you miss the program, you can access the recoded show just below the player in the center column (you are given a choice for video or audio playback), or you can go to http://www.theedgeam.com/theedgepodcast.xml to download the audio podcast.

Next is my interview with Mike Bennett (aka Dr. Future) on the Future Quake Show on Tuesday, December 27 at 8PM Eastern. This is actually a podcast, not a live show, so you have to download it after its posted. Go to www.futurequake.com and click on the Past Shows link on the navigation bar, which will take you to the page where the shows are listed chronologically. At the top and to the right of each show listing you will find a Show Audio File link, which you can click to play or right click and select Save to download the mp3 file to your had drive. 

Finally, I will have a one-hour interview with Paul and Ben Eno on Behind The Paranormal on Monday, January 9 at 6PM Eastern. Paul and Ben have live shows on several networks. My interview will be on WOON 1240 AM in Rhode Island, which is broadcast in the Boston, Worcester and Providence listening areas, so my Massachusetts fans can hear me on the radio this time. You can also get this show live on the web by going to www.onworldwide.com. There is a group of buttons (I think they call them “Tiles” now) near the top of the page, Click on the ON TV button to watch the live TV feed, or click the ON @ WORK to listen to the live audio feed. You can catch the recorded podcast once it’s posted on www.behindtheparanormal.com/podcasts2011.htm. Look for the show in the right column and click to LISTEN button. You can also right-click on this button and select Save to download the mp3 file.

_ Well folks, here we go again. CERN has run another test on their neutrinos with a more concentrated beam to satisfy one of the numerous objections from the scientific community. They report that the results were the same. Of course, this was reported prominently in the news once again because of the sensationalism it provides. 

There are numerous variables and other issues to be considered. First, have you noticed that none of these reports from the mainstream press ever mention exactly how they calculated the distance between the sending and receiving points? Remember that these positions are underground, making the relative distance between the two points almost impossible to ascertain with the kind of precision needed to confirm such measurements. Recall too that the path taken by these neutrinos is through solid rock, and so the distance cannot be verified by comparing it to the travel time of other particles projected along the identical path. The best GPS positioning could still be off by as much as several meters vertically, which would make a huge difference over 474 miles, which is the distance in question. Other factors like weather conditions can also affect GPS accuracy. And yes, orbital variations can also contribute. One could try to triangulate from a measurement across the surface, but the earth is not a perfect sphere, and you’d have to account for every minor local protuberance in the topology.

The report sites a speed of 60 nanoseconds faster than a photon (particle of light) would travel the same distance. A nanosecond is one billionth of a second. If the distance were precisely 474 miles, at the speed light we’d only need a variation of 58 feet to get the variance in question. That’s only one-hundredth of a mile, or .01%. To put it another way, that would be only 58 feet out of 2,502,720 feet (474 miles). There seems to be no way to nail this down precisely without an identical conduit through which photons could be fired for comparison, which is what they’re proposing. However, it’s unclear how they would be able to bore through the solid rock to precisely duplicate the path these neutrinos are traveling.
 
There are other issues involved that call these findings into question. Unlike Newton’s laws that were increasingly called into question as more and more experiments with energy gave rise to anomalous observations that contradicted his model, Einstein’s model of the universe with its top-end light speed has been verified over and over again, sometimes in remarkable and unexpected ways. Many formulas have been derived from relativity that correlate perfectly with real-world observations. Were these neutrinos actually proved to be traveling faster than like, then we’d have to accept that we’ve been using these “defective” equations all this time, and yet they still magically give us the correct answers! This is why the vast majority of the scientific community expect there’s something wrong with the experiment. 

Next there is the motivational factor, which I think we’d be foolish not to consider. CERN convinced many nations to contribute funding for the Large Hadron Collider with the promise they’d find elusive particles like the Higg’s boson that could pave the way for new and fantastic technology. Now that they’re losing hope in finding these, how do they get nations to commit more funding for similar future projects in these troubled economic times after laying this huge egg? How do all those physicists keep their jobs? What if they were to uncover a sensational finding that would refute Einstein and hold out the promise for incredible results like time travel? Now they need more funding to lay a 474-mile conduit through solid rock across territorial boundaries. Think it can’t happen? Think again. Virtually every qualified scientific authority agrees that it was very irresponsible for CERN to publicly announce the results of their experiment before it could be reproduced and corroborated by other labs. So why did they violate normal and accepted scientific procedures by this announcement? You tell me.    

_ Wednesday’s interview with GeorgeAnn Hughes of the Byte Show was posted shortly after the recording. Go to http://www.thebyteshow.com/Guests.html and look for my name and the book title in the list. This is a small mp3 file that can be played by clicking on it, although my browser required Apple QuickTime to do it. Rather than install it, what I did was right-clicked and selected Save As (or Save Link As) and then selected a location on my hard drive. Once saved, you can double-click to play it Windows Media Player or just about any other player you may have installed. The next installment will be recorded next Wednesday. I believe this will be a three-part series. She will eventually post a category under my name on Audio Library page where all my interviews will be posted.