Dark Matter in the News Again

At the risk of sounding like a broken record, folks know I've been saying for years that, based on the experimentally testable predictions of supergeometric theory, there's no such thing as dark matter. An article in this month's Scientific American (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dark-matters-elusiveness-means-search-may-soon-become-more-challenging/) reports the frustration of physicists at failing to detect the slightest evidence of its existence, even with the most sophisticated devices. Running out of options, the prospects are fading for ever detecting it. What I find most interesting is the statement at the end of the article that, if dark matter only interacts with normal matter through gravity, then we'll never find it. The statement is important because it reveals what you weren't taught in school: there is no physical constituent to gravity, no material component to it like a graviton or a gravity wave, and therefore there would be nothing material to detect. Zip, zilch, nada, just as the supergeometric model shows. Of course, paranormalists already know about physical effects with no detectable local material cause. The article covers just about every possibility save one: that dark matter really doesn't exist. Why are they so resistant to the possibility? Because that admission, with one fell swoop, will utterly destroy forever the materialistic paradigm that dominates physics today. I'm sure that's a frightening prospect to many of them. They thought they left researchers like myself at the base of the mountain as they scaled the summit of reality. Imagine their embarrassment when they reach the top and find us to have been sitting there all along.